![]() ![]() It gives very few people far too much control (top-down control by centralisation and consolidation of authority). They use buzzwords like “digitalisation”, but the agenda is multi-faceted and potentially very dangerous. Many other things in “modern” society are being turned into a computer for no good, pragmatic/practical reasons. No reason/s to give a large contract to some “tech” company. When I vote here a few days from now it’ll involve only paper, a pencil, and a physical box with a hole in it. There are many perfectly legitimise reasons to avoid voting machines. “We are seeing many cautionary tales right now in Russia and in China.”We kindly ask people not to fall for it. Pseudo-liberal media will be missing the point, as usual, instead stigmatising critics and sceptics of voting machines as "Nazis". So, as noted in Daily Links ( much more on this later), Dominion won a case against a very “soft” target (Rupert Murdoch, serial fabricator), but voting machines must still be avoided, criticised, and generally protested against. ![]() Summary: Straw man arguments for voting machines - or against critics of these - will become ubiquitous in days to come it’s important to distinguish between the disinformation from Rupert Murdoch’s media apparatus and the actual science (many distinguished scientists have long warned against voting machines, more so proprietary ones) Kennedy and Zell Rabin in the Oval Office in 1961 Straw man arguments can undermine democracy, too ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |